<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Backporch Beer &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer</link>
	<description>How To Create a Sarcasm Mark in Textile: *~¡~*</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My Father, The Musician</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2009/06/21/4558/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2009/06/21/4558/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[father's day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=4558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	For most of my life, I thought of my mother as the musical parent. She played both guitar and piano, checked out albums when we made trips to the library, and was always singing. During the holidays, she was the one who went to sing and play in the folk-music circle at a friend&#8217;s house. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For most of my life, I thought of my mother as the musical parent. She played both guitar and piano, checked out albums when we made trips to the library, and was always singing. During the holidays, she was the one who went to sing and play in the folk-music circle at a friend&#8217;s house. She was the one I remember giving all the credit for my love of music.  I thought of my father as the one who paid the bills. I was shaped by his dedication to his job and his steadfast obligation to provide for our family, sometimes in the face of a truly &#8220;negative work environment.&#8221; He worked in the petroleum industry as an engineer during the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s and, especially now, I can empathize as I experience the exponential boom and bust of the technology sector.</p>

	<p>As an adult, I now realize there was more nuance than I noticed as a child.  My mother almost always had a side job, sometimes teaching guitar or piano in our house, or substitute teaching at our school. Recently I realized that it was my father who nearly wore out the orange plastic 8-track of Johnny Cash&#8217;s <strong>Orange Blossom Special</strong> in the old red pickup we drove out in the country where I was raised.  So, I know my dad always loved music as much as my mother, just that he devoted all his time to his job, house and garden, making sure his family was fed and sheltered.</p>

	<p>When he retired several years ago, Dad bought a bass and started learning how to play.  Then he took singing lessons so he could play <em>and</em> sing.  These days on weekends you are likely to find my parents at a campground playing and singing together with like-minded musicians in the Ozark Mountains. My mother is the one who plays multiple instruments and sings the best, but it is my father with his engineering-trained focus who impresses me the most.  In a few short years he has become a masterful bass player, acquiring various styles of high quality instruments on eBay, and his deep voice is a moving addition to the circles in which he plays.</p>

	<p>When <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=13">Fresh Air</a> played <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=13&#38;prgDate=6-19-2009">this episode</a> on Friday about fathers, featuring an <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105599073">interview with Jimmie Dale Gilmore</a> about his traditional country album dedicated to his late father, and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105599073">one with Wayne and Darrell Scott</a> about son Darrell&#8217;s release of his father Wayne&#8217;s original songs, I could only imagine my father enjoying the heck out of the music and the stories.  Since I don&#8217;t know enough about basses to pick out a good one on eBay (besides the fact that my father always just buys what he wants anyway), I offer him this small gift of a post on my blog with these two audio pieces from Fresh Air that I know he&#8217;ll love.</p>

	<p>Jimmie Dale Gilmore: In Song, A Eulogy For Dad:<br />
<script type='text/javascript' src='/backporchbeer/simpleviewer/swfobject.js'></script>
  <div id='mediaspacefa200906jdg'>&nbsp;</div>
  <script type='text/javascript'>
  var s1 = new SWFObject('/backporchbeer/player.swf','ply','470','20','9','#ffffff');
  s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
  s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
  s1.addParam('wmode','opaque');
  s1.addParam('flashvars','file=http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/FreshAir20090619JDG.mp3&#038;duration=773');
  s1.write('mediaspacefa200906jdg');
</script></p>

	<p>Wayne And Darrell Scott: Father-Son Country<br />
<script type='text/javascript' src='/backporchbeer/simpleviewer/swfobject.js'></script>
  <div id='mediaspacefa200906wds'>&nbsp;</div>
  <script type='text/javascript'>
  var s1 = new SWFObject('/backporchbeer/player.swf','ply','470','20','9','#ffffff');
  s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','false');
  s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
  s1.addParam('wmode','opaque');
  s1.addParam('flashvars','file=http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/FreshAir20090619WDS.mp3&#038;duration=480');
  s1.write('mediaspacefa200906wds');
</script></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2009/06/21/4558/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why/What I Voted Today</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/11/04/3919/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/11/04/3919/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DirtyHippies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	No, I did not early vote and I don&#8217;t feel bad about that (particularly since I was 1 of 3 voters at my polling place.)  Also, I have been vacillating on Proposition 2 and since I believe that their is a inverse correlation between the geographic size/impact of a vote and the power/performance of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No, I did not early vote and I don&#8217;t feel bad about that (particularly since I was 1 of 3 voters at my polling place.)  Also, I have been vacillating on <a href="http://www.txcn.com/sharedcontent/dws/txcn/austin/stories/101708kvue_prop2-cb.121983946.html">Proposition 2</a> and since I believe that their is a inverse correlation between the geographic size/impact of a vote and the power/performance of a vote, it is more important to be sure about local ballot initiatives (and candidates).</p>

	<p>I understand and support both sides of the issue on Prop 2 &#8212; an amendment to the City Charter banning tax incentives for multi-housing and multi-business development.  It is poorly worded and will have a negative impact to the City Charter if it is passed.  However, lately the <acronym title="City of Austin">COA</acronym> City Council has shown a financial preference to big box retailers over local business, which translates into more money (and big money) going out-of-state in return for low-wage jobs.  In the end I voted for Prop 2 for two reasons.</p>

	<p>First, our Council members need to hear a clear message from the voters that we prefer &#8220;Keep Austin Weird&#8221; to convenient big box retail shopping.  We can rely on the outlying suburb cities to keep us stocked in Best Buy, Michael Kors and Macy&#8217;s stores.  Heck, since Bee Caves closed the Backyard to build a strip mall blight on the Hill Country landscape I think we can assume that they&#8217;ll be perfectly willing to destroy any city charm in favor of low-cost high-impact shopping.  Second, the argument that expensive lawsuits will surely follow is flawed since the lawsuits will be cheaper then the cost of the tax incentives and economic impact.</p>

	<p>Happy voting day everyone.  If you&#8217;re in a swing state then good luck with your presidential candidate of choice.  The rest of us need to focus on local concerns.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/11/04/3919/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Platforms explained</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/09/30/3883/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/09/30/3883/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	During the debate last week, both candidates spewed a lot of tax plan &#8220;details&#8221; back and forth but I couldn&#8217;t really figure out what either of them were actually proposing or how it would affect me. So, I was delighted to find this new thought leadership piece from my employer, &#8220;A familiar call for change: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>During the debate last week, both candidates spewed a lot of tax plan &#8220;details&#8221; back and forth but I couldn&#8217;t really figure out what either of them were actually proposing or how it would affect me. So, I was delighted to find this new thought leadership piece from my employer, &#8220;<a href="http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/us_tax_taxplatformsofcandidates_091908.pdf">A familiar call for change: tax platforms of the presidential candidates</a>&#8220; waiting in my Inbox this morning.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/09/30/3883/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hilary Hysteria</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/08/26/3709/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/08/26/3709/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	As an independent, I am only involved with party politics in brief passionate affairs of surface issues.  Listening to NPR this morning, I was exposed to some of the inner workings of the DNC and I can&#8217;t help but wonder when delegates say things like &#8220;if Hilary isn&#8217;t on the roll call, then people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As an independent, I am only involved with party politics in brief passionate affairs of surface issues.  Listening to <span class="caps">NPR</span> this morning, I was exposed to some of the inner workings of the <span class="caps">DNC</span> and I can&#8217;t help but wonder when delegates say things like &#8220;if Hilary isn&#8217;t on the roll call, then people will think it is because she&#8217;s a woman,&#8221; are they really saying &#8220;if I don&#8217;t vote for Obama, then it may be because he&#8217;s black.&#8221;?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/08/26/3709/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain vs Detainees &#8211; Really?!?</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/14/3272/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/14/3272/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The press is afraid to fully say it, but I will be glad to call John McCain&#8217;s on his interpretation of the recent SCOTUS ruling.  When McCain says that the law he helped craft &#8220;made it very clear that these are enemy combatants, they are not citizens, they do not have the rights of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The press is afraid to fully say it, but I will be glad to call John McCain&#8217;s on <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080614/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_detainees">his interpretation of the recent <span class="caps">SCOTUS</span> ruling</a>.  When McCain says that the law he helped craft &#8220;made it very clear that these are enemy combatants, they are not citizens, they do not have the rights of citizens&#8221;, he is suggesting that this ruling gives these detainees the rights of citizens.  It does not, from what I&#8217;ve read.  What it does say is that a human being of any nationality that is being held by the US government has the right of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus">habeas corpus</a> &#8212; that it is unlawful (and immoral) to hold a man indefinitely without giving them the right to defend themselves.  The ruling makes it clear that the &#8220;military courts&#8221; the conservatives have been trying to define are not sufficient to the standard.</p>

	<p>One of the things that surprises me about John McCain&#8217;s reaction is that he was a prisoner of war who was denied these rights, and yet somehow he doesn&#8217;t think these people deserve better.  Habeas corpus is based on the true Christian values that this country was based on &#8212; treating men equally whether or not you align with their religious convictions.  To deny this right to the people we are detaining is to treat them in a manner that shames me.</p>

	<p>It certainly doesn&#8217;t help my opinion of McCain when he associates himself with the a hypocrite of Lindsey Graham&#8217;s level.  &#8220;&#8230;the greatest of these is charity&#8230;&#8221; unless you&#8217;re a detainee and then we&#8217;ll lock you up for five (or more) years.  Graham&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindsey_Graham#Detainee_interrogations">amendment to the DoD Authorization Act</a> &#8212; what the Supreme Court was decrying with this ruling &#8212; shows his lack of compassion, so it was no surprise to hear him standing next to McCain sayng:</p>

	<blockquote>
		<p> What happened yesterday was unprecedented.  Americans are going to be shocked to find that that mastermind of 9-11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, now has the same legal standing as an American citizen.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p>He&#8217;s either the worst spin man in Washington, or he&#8217;s a judicial idiot.  In no way does this decision give detainees the full legal standing of an American citizen.  It simply gives them the rights any captive should have.</p>

	<p>I was supportive of Bob Dole several years ago when he announced his intention to run for <span class="caps">POTUS</span>, then he started his campaign and began spouting dogmatic anti-Christian attitudes.  I had strong positive feelings for McCain before the campaign started.  I really thought he could be a good modern face for conservatives.  Now it is becoming clear that he wants to continue (what has apparently become the true thrust of) the neo-conservative attitude &#8212; increasing international inequity, restricting freedom and promoting violence in the world.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/14/3272/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wil Wynn On Proposed Energy Efficient Real Estate Program</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/12/3269/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/12/3269/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DirtyHippies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	For you non-Austinites (and you Austinites that don&#8217;t keep up with local politics&#8230;I know, that&#8217;s redundant) there has been a lot of churn around proposals for new regulation on selling/buying homes in Austin that aspires to increase the energy efficiency of real estate in the area.  Most of it has been fodder for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For you non-Austinites (and you Austinites that don&#8217;t keep up with local politics&#8230;I know, that&#8217;s redundant) there has been a lot of churn around proposals for new regulation on selling/buying homes in Austin that aspires to increase the energy efficiency of real estate in the area.  Most of it has been fodder for the City Council run-off elections, but it&#8217;s nice to see Mayor Wil Wynn release <a href="http://austinist.com/2008/06/11/letter_from_will_wynn_re_energy_aud.php">a letter</a> explaining what is going on.</p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230; I want to try to set the record straight. I hope that you will take a moment to read this.  &#8230; Make no mistake: powering our homes and buildings is going to get more expensive, perhaps dramatically. Right now, we have an opportunity to get in front of it. &#8230;  Sellers wouldn&#8217;t have to make upgrades, and they wouldn&#8217;t have to pass an inspection &#8211; they would just have to let buyers know what kind of efficiency condition the house is in. &#8230; The Task Force is discussing a <span class="caps">VOLUNTARY</span> program. Under a voluntary program, &#8220;low-hanging fruit&#8221; like weather stripping and duct sealing would be prioritized, and spending caps would be proposed. All of Austin Energy&#8217;s rebates and incentives would be available, including their low-interest loan program. &#8230; <br />
Sincerely, <br />
Will Wynn<br />
Austin Mayor </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p>I love having a mayor whose name is so aggressively positive, and while he hasn&#8217;t been a perfect mayor I think this kind of missive is representative of why I think he&#8217;s been a really good mayor.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/06/12/3269/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bush Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/04/14/3219/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/04/14/3219/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/?p=3219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I really have nothing to say on the matter that hasn&#8217;t been said before, but I loved it when my man Doggett used the phrase &#8220;Mr Bush&#8217;s Recession&#8221; at the end of a speech recently, so I thought I would start spreading that phrase around.

	Of course, we may need more delineation that that.  Maybe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really have nothing to say on the matter that hasn&#8217;t been said before, but I loved it when my man Doggett used the phrase &#8220;Mr Bush&#8217;s Recession&#8221; at the end of <a href="http://www.house.gov/doggett/speeches/04-10-2008_ColombiaFTA.wmv">a speech</a> recently, so I thought I would start spreading that phrase around.</p>

	<p>Of course, we may need more delineation that that.  Maybe we should call it Lil&#8217; Bush&#8217;s Recession.  We wouldn&#8217;t want to cause confusion with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession#History_of_recessions_in_the_United_States">the other U.S. recessions</a> &#8212; you know, Big Bush&#8217;s Recession or Reagan&#8217;s Recession (oh, ok, or Carter&#8217;s Recession.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/04/14/3219/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This American Life #353, and Horton Hears A Who</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/30/3203/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/30/3203/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/30/3203/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	There&#8217;s a lot of things to discuss with TAL lately.  Even though TSOTAL only yielded a couple dozen episodes, I remain an ardent fan.  I&#8217;m preparing for the second TAL Austin Brunch Club, and just as I return from a vacation in The Big Apple, a live TAL theater event will be broadcast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There&#8217;s a lot of things to discuss with <acronym title="This American Life">TAL</acronym> lately.  Even though <acronym title="The Summer Of This American Life">TSOTAL</acronym> only yielded a couple dozen episodes, I remain an ardent fan.  I&#8217;m preparing for the second <span class="caps">TAL</span> Austin Brunch Club, and just as I return from a vacation in The Big Apple, a <a href="http://www.thislife.org/Redirect_Banner.aspx?ID=359">live <span class="caps">TAL</span> theater event</a> will be broadcast around the country.  Most recently &#8212; just this morning as a matter of fact &#8212; I&#8217;m pondering episode <a href="http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=353">#353:  The Audacity of Government</a>.</p>

	<p>Ira and Jack Hitt take us through a number of disturbing events in the government/legal realm of late, and it reveals a disturbing trend.  Repeatedly the Bush Whitehouse has decided to sign away laws, create rules that don&#8217;t exist, or ignore the rules altogether.  What were formerly binding agreements with the US, are now worthless.  Why does any foreign country trust us, except their obligation to our massive financial powers&#8230;and what will they do when that goes away?  (Sidebar:  Yes, Alex P Jones is a nut but you should listen to what he has to say about our flailing economy and follow the trail of Alan Greenspan&#8217;s investments outside the US.)  Where the Justice Department once relied on the justice system, now they invent their own rules when necessary and redact the ones they dislike.  How can the people of this country trust the JD when the say &#8220;we can decide to do whatever we want without explanation on our part or recourse on yours&#8221;?</p>

	<p>Jack and Ira spend the last few minutes of the episode discussing the fact that the now meaningless boundaries of the legal system are the real issue of this election year, and how the potential candidates have responded to Bush&#8217;s abuses.  I feel it is not enough to have the lip service of the candidates.  Watching <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0451079/"><ins>Horten Hears A Who</ins></a> today I felt immense empathy for the poor Whovillians &#8212; helplessly tossed about in a world they can no longer control.  We must stand together in the face of our government and make as much noise as possible.</p>

	<p>We are here!  We are here!  We are here!</p>

	<p><ins>Horton Hears A Who</ins> is not the return of <ins>Toy Story</ins> days, but it is very well done and quite funny.  Be careful that your children don&#8217;t see it or they may start to question authority.</p>

	<p>p.s.  Is it silly to lay the seriousness of our dire political situation alongside the animated adventures of an elephant?  Dr. Suess, the Lorax and even the Onceler would say it is not.</p>

	<p>p.p.s.  Do we refuse to vote for John McCain because he will carry with him many of the same advisers that have stolen justice from us in the last 8 years &#8212; a form of punishment to show the <span class="caps">GOP</span> that what has transpired on their watch is unacceptable? or do we trust that he is somehow the anti-<span class="caps">GOP</span> within the <span class="caps">GOP</span> that will return it to a path of sensible government <acronym title="for the people by the people">FTPBTP</acronym>?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/30/3203/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hope ain&#8217;t a 4 letter word</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/17/3197/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/17/3197/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/17/3197/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	And Change isn&#8217;t something that you get from the gas station. I&#8217;ve buried most of this below the jump &#8211; it&#8217;s a bit out there, and I&#8217;d like to spend a moment thanking the good people of Wyoming and Mississippi for a bit of sense over the last few weeks.

	After years of dealing with recovering right-wing idealogue guilt, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And Change isn&#8217;t something that you get from the gas station. I&#8217;ve buried most of this below the jump &#8211; it&#8217;s a bit out there, and I&#8217;d like to spend a moment thanking the good people of Wyoming and Mississippi for a bit of sense over the last few weeks.</p>

	<p>After years of dealing with recovering right-wing idealogue guilt, I can finally put my finger on why Sen. Clinton rubs me raw.</p>

	<p>When she was declaring victory in Ohio, the crowds began chanting &#8220;Yes, She Will&#8221;, a riff on Sen. Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Yes, We Can&#8221;. Which manages to be pandering, insulting, and a rip-off all at the same time. I fear that any election featuring Sen. Clinton will continue to be a referendum on the politics of the personal instead of any actual issues. Which is kind of a shame for her, but it is what it is.</p>

	<p>By the same principle, I&#8217;m fundamentally opposed to, say a Jeb or Jenna Bush run.</p>

	<p><span id="more-3197"></span></p>

	<p>Allow me to deconstruct:<br />
<ol>
	<li>The focus is on &#8220;She&#8221;, as in &#8220;Oh, save us oh great and mighty Hillary&#8221;. I don&#8217;t want to be indebted to the folks I elect &#8211; the relationship ought to work the other way around &#8211; listen to the constituents, listen to the electorate, and do <span class="caps">THEIR</span> will, not your own. Granted, there are certain times when the representative of the people may be in a better position to judge things, and may, on occasion, need to contravene the will of the people. However, these extraneous circumstances need to be few and far between, and need to be explained penitantly, with the understanding that the people have the prerogative to kick the public servant to the curb. Sen Clinton and many others seem to think that since they&#8217;ve risen through the party ranks, the people ought to do their bidding at the ballot box, and that once elected, her job is to pick winners.</li>
	<li>Following her declared right to the office of president, we are told what &#8220;she will&#8221; do. The president, absent times of emergency, ought to be more of a &#8220;facilitator-in-chief&#8221; than a &#8220;commander-in- chief&#8221;. I&#8217;m finding more and more that the most effective leaders I run into, and the ones who I try to emulate, are those who can articulate a general vision, win concensus, and get people to figure out how to make it happen, rather than those who have a fully-formed end state in mind and try to command their way to a conclusion.</li>
	<li>&#8220;Yes, she will&#8221; is also the absolute worst kind of derivative work &#8211; a cheap, quick ripoff, mainly designed to raise the ire of the people from who it was taken without adding meaning or being in the least bit clever. It&#8217;s the kind of crap that those of us on the right wing have been doing as long as Limbaugh has been on the radio, the kind of crap that was thrown at the &#8220;Contract on America&#8221;, the kind of crap that does nothing but stifle discussion. (Pot, kettle)</li><br />
</ol><br />
I am really, really jazzed about the possibility of a McCain/Obama campaign. Two people who really have been trying to avoid the knock down/drag out during the primary; the same vitriol that has characterized both sides of the aisle since about 1988 and the Willie Horton and Tank ads, and Clinton&#8217;s dwelling<br />
on &#8220;No New Taxes&#8221;.</p>

	<p>Is it naieve on my part? Probably; upon reaching half of my allotted threescore and ten, I ought to know better than to think that there&#8217;s hope of civility. But I can&#8217;t actually think that. As often as I see reason to be cynical, I also see reason to be hopeful, people who restore my faith in the goodness of America. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/17/3197/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That&#8217;s My Congressman!</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/11/3190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/11/3190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/11/3190/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I <3 <a href="http://www.house.gov/doggett/">Lloyd Doggett</a>!</p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Torture is no proper tool in the arsenal of democracy.  Torture is foreign to our values, foreign to our history, foreign to our religions, foreign to our laws, and to our international commitments. There can be no compromise. No middle ground.  There must be zero tolerance for torture.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p><embed
src="/backporchbeer/flvplayer.swf"
width="320"
height="240"
allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true"
flashvars="height=240&#038;width=320&#038;file=/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/03-11-2008_Intel_Veto.flv&#038;image=/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/03-11-2008_Intel_Veto.jpg&#038;repeat=false&#038;shuffle=false"
/></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/11/3190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the GOP Pick Democratic Candidate For Texas?</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/05/3184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/05/3184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/05/3184/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I think the professional analysts will get into this statistical morass eventually, but I have to consider whether some GOP voters in Texas were casting Hillary ballots as Dems since McCain has a much better chance against her.

	This is the turnout for the 2004 primary.

	
		
			2004
			d
			r
			total
			registered
		
		
			total
			839231
			687615
			1526846
			12264663
		
		
			%
			6.84%
			5.61%
			12.45%
			&#160;
		
	

	This is the turnout for the 2008 primary.

	
		
			2008
			d
			r
			total
			registered
		
		
			early
			1285444
			561907
			1847351
			&#160;
		
		
			day
			2856813
			1380907
			4237720
			&#160;
		
		
			total
			4142257
			1942814
			6085071
			12752417
		
		
			%
			32.48%
			15.23%
			47.72%
			&#160;
		
	

	Sure, the Dems are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the professional analysts will get into this statistical morass eventually, but I have to consider whether some <span class="caps">GOP</span> voters in Texas were casting Hillary ballots as Dems since McCain has a much better chance against her.</p>

	<p>This is the turnout for the 2004 primary.</p>

	<table style="border:1px solid black;">
		<tr style="vertical-align:middle;background:#ddd; border-width:2px; border-style:solid; border-color:black;">
			<th style="text-align:center;">2004</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">d</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">r</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">total</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">registered</th>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:1px solid #666666; ;">
			<th>total</th>
			<td>839231</td>
			<td>687615</td>
			<td>1526846</td>
			<td>12264663</td>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:2px solid black; ;">
			<th>%</th>
			<td>6.84%</td>
			<td>5.61%</td>
			<td>12.45%</td>
			<td>&nbsp;</td>
		</tr>
	</table>

	<p>This is the turnout for the 2008 primary.</p>

	<table style="border:1px solid black;">
		<tr style="vertical-align:middle;background:#ddd; border-width:2px border-style:solid border-color:black;">
			<th style="text-align:center;">2008</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">d</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">r</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">total</th>
			<th style="text-align:center;">registered</th>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:2px solid black;">
			<th>early</th>
			<td>1285444</td>
			<td>561907</td>
			<td>1847351</td>
			<td>&nbsp;</td>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:2px solid black;">
			<th>day</th>
			<td>2856813</td>
			<td>1380907</td>
			<td>4237720</td>
			<th>&nbsp;</th>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:2px solid black;">
			<th>total</th>
			<td>4142257</td>
			<td>1942814</td>
			<td>6085071</td>
			<td>12752417</td>
		</tr>
		<tr style="background:#ddd; border:2px solid black;">
			<th>%</th>
			<td>32.48%</td>
			<td>15.23%</td>
			<td>47.72%</td>
			<td>&nbsp;</td>
		</tr>
	</table>

	<p>Sure, the Dems are fired up about finally having viable candidates to support &#8212; and I think I heard something about dissatisfaction with something about current events or whatever &#8212; but I have to believe that former <span class="caps">GOP</span> voters contributed to the 2:1  party turnout when four years ago the ratio was almost 1:1.</p>

	<p>p.s.  This table created with Textile shortcuts.  Check out <a href="http://hobix.com/textile/#tables">this advanced tutorial</a> on the topic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/05/3184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote Today &#8211; Twice!</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/04/3183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/04/3183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/04/3183/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I suspect that there&#8217;s no chance you&#8217;ll forget to vote today, especially given the constant tv and video ads, plus the friendly reminders from certain Obama supporters in the DC area (thanks, Alex!).

	Just in case you didn&#8217;t get the handy &#8220;do the texas 2 step&#8221; mailer from Obama, here&#8217;s what to do:
FIRST &#8211; Between 7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I suspect that there&#8217;s no chance you&#8217;ll forget to vote today, especially given the constant tv and video ads, plus the friendly reminders from certain Obama supporters in the DC area (thanks, Alex!).</p>

	<p>Just in case you didn&#8217;t get the handy &#8220;do the texas 2 step&#8221; mailer from Obama, here&#8217;s what to do:<br />
<span class="caps">FIRST</span> &#8211; Between 7 am and 7 pm &#8211; vote in your primary. You can find your voting locating <a href="http://www.co.travis.tx.us/county_clerk/election/20080304/polls.asp">here</a>.<br />
<span class="caps">SECOND</span> &#8211; At 7:15 sharp, attend the caucus at your primary voting location. Raise your hand when they say the name of the fine candidate you support. You <span class="caps">MUST</span> have voted in the democratic primary to caucus.</p>

	<p>Have fun today, everyone. Oh, and if I happen to see you without an &#8220;I Voted&#8221; sticker today watch out for a swift kick in the shins.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/03/04/3183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain Media Massage</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/28/3173/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/28/3173/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>etrigan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paranoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/28/3173/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	One of the few upsides about being late for your headshrink appointment is that you have plenty of time to read the magazines you almost wish you subscribed to (but that you know you&#8217;d never get around to reading.)  In my guy&#8217;s waiting room was a fresh copy of Newsweek (February 18, 2008) which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One of the few upsides about being late for your headshrink appointment is that you have plenty of time to read the magazines you almost wish you subscribed to (but that you know you&#8217;d never get around to reading.)  In my guy&#8217;s waiting room was a fresh copy of Newsweek (February 18, 2008) which normally has a liberal bent, but from the cover and article inside about McCain it almost felt like a Rovian trick to get moderate liberals considering a vote for McCain.</p>

	<p><a href='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2266.JPG' title='newsweek 2008 02 mccain cover'><img src='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2266.thumbnail.JPG' alt='newsweek 2008 02 mccain cover' /></a></p>

	<p>The article went into detailed descriptions of why the <acronym title="conservative media conspiracy">CMC</acronym> are spewing hatred at the presumptive <span class="caps">GOP</span> nominee.  Rush, Coulter, Hannity, you name &#8216;em &#8212; they have all said that a vote for McCain is anti-Republican, anti-Conservative, anti-Regan, and anti-American.  Oddly enough, though, the polls show that America thinks he&#8217;d do a good job as <acronym title="President of the United States">POTUS</acronym> despite all that.</p>

	<p><a href='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2265.JPG' title='newsweek 2008 02 mccain chart'><img src='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2265.thumbnail.JPG' alt='newsweek 2008 02 mccain chart' /></a></p>

	<p>The conspiracy theorist in me wants to believe that McCain&#8217;s spin doctors snuck this story onto the lead of Newsweek to flush out on-the-fence voters for their candidate.  The optimist in me &#8212; which has a much smaller voice &#8212; thinks that Newsweek is simply covering the kind of topics that it&#8217;s readership want to know about.  What confuses the whole matter of whether Newsweek has become a shill for McCain is this picture from another story supposedly about the campaign trail and Obama.</p>

	<p><a href='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2267.JPG' title='newsweek 2008 02 mccain photo'><img src='http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/img_2267.thumbnail.JPG' alt='newsweek 2008 02 mccain photo' /></a></p>

	<p>p.s.  The only weekly magazine I make time for these days is Entertainment Weekly&#8230;and sometimes it takes me 8 days to finish it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/28/3173/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with Hillary&#8217;s head?</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/14/3146/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/14/3146/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/14/3146/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I&#8217;m still undecided, but if I were basing my vote on these photos of the candidates, Obama gets it, hands down. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m still undecided, but if I were basing my vote on <a href="https://secure.txdemocrats.org/page/contribute/debatewatch">these photos of the candidates</a>, Obama gets it, hands down. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/14/3146/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Apparel Wants Your Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/11/3114/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/11/3114/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/11/3114/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s no shock I&#8217;m a registered Democrat, and I&#8217;m really having a hard time deciding who I&#8217;m going to vote for come March 4. It&#8217;s an interesting (and pretty thrilling, really) field of candidates. American Apparel decided to weigh in on my choice via email this morning:



Four decades ago, the chairman of General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s no shock I&#8217;m a registered Democrat, and I&#8217;m really having a hard time deciding who I&#8217;m going to vote for come March 4. It&#8217;s an interesting (and pretty thrilling, really) field of candidates. American Apparel decided to weigh in on my choice via email this morning:<br />
<span id="more-3114"></span><br />
<table border="0" align="center" width="592" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0"><tr><td style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 2px; padding-bottom: 40px; padding-top: 30px"><img width="492" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/supertuesday.gif" height="121" /></td></tr><tr><td height="18" bgColor="#000000"></td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 61px; font: bold 18px helevetica, arial; padding-top: 14px"><img width="295" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/obama.jpg" height="295" /><img width="294" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/mccain.jpg" height="295" /><br />
<p align="center" style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 21px; padding-top: 30px"><img width="45" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/gm.gif" height="44" /></p><br />
Four decades ago, the chairman of <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_0" class="yshortcuts">General Motors</span> proclaimed:<br />
&#8220;What&#8217;s good for GM is good for America.&#8221; Today we&#8217;re saying,<br />
&#8220;What&#8217;s good for American Apparel is good for America.&#8221;</p>

	<p><span style="color: #000078">We urge voters to consider Obama on the Democratic side.</span></p>

	<p><span style="color: #a40020">We urge voters to consider McCain on the Republican side.</span></p>

	<p>Why? Because of their honesty on the issue of immigration, the most significant civil rights concern the country has faced in<br />
50 years.</td></tr><tr><td height="18" bgColor="#000000"></td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 61px; font: 10px verdana; padding-top: 8px"><p style="padding-bottom: 39px; font: bold 30px helevetica, arial">Why Not Clinton?</p><p style="padding-right: 50px">We appreciate <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_1" class="yshortcuts">Senator Clinton</span>&#8216;s campaign on many fronts, but when it comes to the issue of immigration she has not shown the same strength and conviction as Obama. This was clear during last week&#8217;s <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_2" class="yshortcuts">California</span> debate. While he supports driver&#8217;s licenses for undocumented workers, she is opposed &#8220;at this time.&#8221; Tell that to a mother of three in East <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_3" class="yshortcuts">L.A</span>. driving her children to school every day. Obama has also pledged to accomplish immigration reform in his first year; Clinton has not made such a commitment. Immigration is the most critical issue that faces the United States, <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_4" class="yshortcuts">California</span>, and <span style="cursor: hand; border-bottom: #0066cc 1px dashed" id="lw_1202229789_5" class="yshortcuts">Los Angeles</span> today—we appreciate the Obama campaign&#8217;s clear voice on it. We also applaud his refusal to scapegoat immigrants for political gain, as some other candidates have.</p><br />
<p style="float: left; padding-top: 6px"><img width="293" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/clintons.jpg" height="295" /></p></td></tr><tr><td height="18" bgColor="#000000"></td></tr><tr><td style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; font: bold 30px helevetica, arial; padding-top: 40px"><img width="277" src="http://i.americanapparel.net/newsletter/images/consumer080204/legalize.gif" height="108" style="margin-bottom: 129px" /><p align="right"><span class="caps">IMMIGRATION</span> <span class="caps">REFORM</span> NOW!</p></td></tr></table></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rollerfeet.com/backporchbeer/2008/02/11/3114/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
