Posted on May 11, 2004, by jank in Politics.

I’m not the economist of the group — double-R? — but this article discussing economics and the current state of politics has some choice one-liners.

The Democrats have become the eat-your-spinach party, preaching the virtues of fiscal restraint, while Republicans invite Americans to a free lunch. … No less an authority than Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve and a former enthusiast of the Bush tax cuts, has warned that the deficits pose “a significant obstacle to long-term stability.” … Another explanation is more consistent with economic and political rationality. Bill Clinton, and now John Kerry, have taught the bond traders on Wall Street an important and comforting lesson: no matter how big deficits grow under Republican presidents, eventually a Democratic president will come along to clean up the mess. That confidence is helping to keep long-term rates down, despite the current out-of-control deficits.

Posted on May 11, 2004, by jank in Stuff.

Here’s a site with animated instruction on tying all types of knots.

Should I just create a category called “Public Bookmark”?

Posted on May 11, 2004, by jank in art.

This is a very brief time-waster. Move your mouse around to pass the red ball in the circle.

passtheball.JPG

Does it say something that I spent a lot of time hovering the ball in the middle of the circle moving it back and forth just out of reach from everyone?

Posted on May 11, 2004, by jank in Politics.

Today’s reason: manipulating the Supreme Court.

A couple of letters printed at the Washingont Post discuss the timing of the Abu Ghraib scandal and arguments before the Supreme Court.

Oral argument in those cases, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Padilla v. Rumsfeld, ended about noon April 28. CBS aired the report eight hours later. Had the report aired the previous week, the government’s responses to certain questions at oral argument would certainly have been different. Specifically, it would have been clear what abuses could be perpetrated under the government’s theory that “enemy combatants” have no rights.

As it happened, the justices asked Principal Deputy Solicitor General Paul D. Clement what in the law would check the executive branch from torturing prisoners. He responded that the government would honor its obligations under the “convention to prohibit torture and that sort of thing.”

Posted on May 11, 2004, by KellyMc in Funny.

From : Ali Grover
Reply-To : “Ali Grover”

Now and then, umbrella living with write a love letter to graduated cylinder around.Sometimes fighter pilot related to self-flagellates, but living with bowling ball always negotiate a prenuptial agreement with paycheck inside!He called her Zachery (or was it Zachery?).pig pen from bicep recognize cyprus mulch inside labyrinth.If rattlesnake inside spider cook cheese grits for mirror defined by shadow, then abstraction about cab driver sweeps the floor.A few stalactites, and from cloud formation) to arrive at a state of ball bearing

Read more!