But just for argument’s sake (isn’t it all?) wouldn’t liberal outrage be a little more palatable if Gore had won the popular vote by a million instead of 300,000? Is it slightly possible that the justices would have had a harder time deciding Bush v Gore?

On the positive side, Nader (are there crackpot activists online who refer to him as “Nadir” in online forums? That’d be a good one.) exposed the liberal/centrist split in the party. We know the problem, and even though the DLC doesn’t care, maybe the next election will further clarify the point.

sheesh, I read a couple of salon articles and I sound like I have an opinion.

I was honestly hoping Ralphie boy would score enough votes to get matching funds to run again in 2004.